As surprising as this may sound, I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t often get a lot of email. Most of them can be easily answered with a few lines and a link. Some of them require much more detailed responses and get turned into posts. The emails that deserve more than a few lines and donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t require posts, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll compile together. IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll end up doing this once a month or so with emails that either myself or the rest of the WoM team donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t get around to answering.
I got into a discussion with a friend the other day about what is easier/harder to play: a tank or a healer – specifically priests and warriors?
He’s convinced that its harder to play a priest (holy/disc hybrid) and I said playing a warrior tank is harder (I have played a disc priest and prot warrior all thru the Wrath Beta and my live priest just hit 80 a few days ago due to tank shortages). I was wondering if you could propose it out to the general community on what they think is harder to play.
My gut instinct here says a tank would be harder. But then again, thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s because IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve never really played a tank. I think if I logged around 72 hours on a Warrior or something I might be able to get the basics down. Tanking and healing are on two separate ends of the spectrum that there is just no comparison at all whatsoever. Both call upon different sets of skills. One guy has his eyes glued to his raid window while the other guy is glued to cooldowns and boss cues.
But IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m sure thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a few players out there that can tank and heal effectively. WhatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s your take?
I am the Paladin class leader of my guild and main holy paladin. I have been reading the post about healing Sartharion 3-drakes. One suggestion involved having a holy paladin use righteous fury to help pull threat on whelps. It’s not something we have tried yet, as we have been using 2 add tanks and 1 drake tanks. However the idea is definitely worth investigating to see if it could work for us as well. However, I am unsure of the spec used by the paladin healer to survive the adds. I have some ideas, but i would like to see a definite spec that has worked, without gimping the healing output. I think that healing output is less, which is why it was mention, that the add tank healer will need help, but i would like to be clear on the extent at which you sacrifice healing talents, for survivability.
Also did the paladin use any pvp gear for increased stamina?
I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t exactly offer much help here. All I know is that the spec did reduce healing effectiveness slightly but not enough to warrant a panic. I believe it involved picking up Divine Guardian (the bubble spec). To really make use of Righteous Fury, the Holy Paladin needs to pair up with and stand on top of the add tank. The first time we tried it, we used it with a couple of PvP pieces to see if it would help increase survivability. But we quickly found out that it was simply unnecessary. Any Paladins want to jump in?
ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s times like this I wish I had a Holy Paladin on retainer somewhere for a consult.
In our guild we have 2 raider ranks:
- Raider noob
The standard for raider noob in BC used to be that if someone had 90% attendance for 2 months and solid performance in raids, they would become a raider noob. However, since the release of wrath all of our recruits have been of exceptional caliber, now probably 23 or so of our 28-29 raiders all have very good performance and 90%+ attendance. This has been wonderful but leaves us with a problem with promotions, we can either promote almost the entire core of our guild to raider noob (as almost all of them have been here for 2 months+), but that would severely alienate the few who don’t make it up to raider noob.
We could increase the duration (which is what we have been doing), but that would only be a temporary solution. The last option I can think of is to increase the standard for raider noob (only our clutch healers, top 5 dps etc), but this would require demoting some of our existing raider noobs, which hardly seems fair as well (they are all good players). Any advice you have would be much appreciated.
Well, youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re in a bind. ThereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s no doubt about that. There is a way but itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s going to involve a lot of heart to heart talking with your raiders. Let them know that the time has come to restructure the guild ranks. Be honest with them about it. The good ones will understand and wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t mind the change in title anyway. A rank is a rank is a rank. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s just a label. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s how you treat the players that count. Let your guild know what the problem is. Heck, you could make a third tier rank that says Ubernoob thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s nothing but the best and the brightest. But then youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re just adding on another layer on top of that, right?
Are you sure about the alienation problem or is that what you would feel? Remember that no WoW players are exactly alike. How one person could react to an event can be completely different to how someone else reacts. You can either axe all the ranks entirely (and set one unifying rank), set the ranks based on seniority (length of time in guild), or availability of raiding (my preference). A player that canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t make all raids is automatically a sub for me or if theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve demonstrated inability to make all raids (or have disappeared for extended periods of time). Otherwise, everyoneÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a raider. I run a tight ship with 3 other senior staff and a loot council.
At the end of the day, remind your guild about who they are and what theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re made of. You said it yourself. You have 28-29 skilled raiders with an impressive 90%+ attendance rate. A lot of guilds would kill for that. If theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re married to their rank and title to the point where theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re willing to quit over it, then maybe itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s time that they walk (which also solves your rank problem anyway since itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s one less person to worry about).